Free Solar Energy For AZ Schools!

A proposal in Arizona could change the way solarthose incentives, meaning they aren't lost and are
energy is marketed.reflected down the road in cheaper installation costs
Typically, solar energy firms install solar panels, oracross the board as profits drive down the cost of
arrays, on a given facility and the proprietor (businesssolar panels.
or homeowner) buys or leases the setup, uses theThat benefit alone, in a time of continuing recession, is
electricity, and sells any excess back to the local ortempting. According to SolarCity, schools could save
regional utility which supplies power to the facility.$4.7 million on energy over the next 15 years by
In Scottsdale, Foster City, a California-based SolarCityadopting the process.
Corp. wants to install solar panels on two school roofs,SolarCity is not the first to make the suggestion, either.
essentially for free, and allow the school district wouldIn October of 2008, Solar Alliance, a state-based
buy the electricity generated.advocacy group for solar designers, manufacturers,
This has regional utility Salt River Project (SRP) up ininstallers and financiers, asked the Corporation
arms. Arizona Public Service Company, the otherCommission to approve similar proposals. In fact, third
regional utility (and the larger by 3,998 megawatts andparty ownership using power purchase agreements
600,000 customers), has posed no objections, even(PPAs) was discussed as an option on Eshone
though both will be required to testify before theEnergy's blog.
Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona's equivalentThe Arizona Corporation Commission has yet to get
of a public utilities commission.back to them, because the decision-making process
The schools in question are Coronado and Desertchallenges so many utility paradigms that there are no
Mountain high schools. The issue in question is: can aparallels, or precedents, to draw upon.
solar manufacturer operate as a utility? Backers of theThis is especially true as customers would still be
proposal see it as a huge incentive to solar power,connected to their local utility for electrical needs
because it frees proprietors from the sometimes hugebeyond the capacity of the individual solar systems.
upfront costs of installing solar arrays. OpponentsAlso weighing heavily on the equation are Arizona's
argue that it would let solar panel manufacturers sellrenewable energy mandates, which requires utilities to
electricity without the oversight of state utilityget 15 percent of their energy from renewable
regulators, leading to electric-pricing disputes and abuse.sources like solar and wind by 2025.
Returning to the issue of upfront costs in solar power,SolarCity has so far rebutted SRP's challenge by
some have noted that, while individuals and evensaying that, since it is not a monopoly, it doesn't need
corporations can offset these with any number ofCorporation Commission regulation.
federal, regional and local incentives, governmentAs Corporation Commission Chairwoman Kris Mayes
buildings and schools aren't eligible for many of them,points out, the entire solar community (and the nation) is
largely because such properties are financed withwaiting for a resolution of these difficult issues. Tom
tax-exempt private activity bonds or other federal,Alston, the head of Solar Alliance in Arizona, confirms
state, or local subsidized financing (Section 48 of thethat, and notes that more than half the recent
Investment Tax Credit).applications for solar installations in the state have
SolarCity argues that those limitations are slowing thebeen coordinated through a solar-service agreement
growth of solar power, and many educators and publiclike the one SolarCity offers.
officials agree. Equally as important, SolarCity, as theClearly, if the proposal is rejected, solar will suffer a
installer and owner of record, can take advantage ofhuge defeat in sunny Arizona.